The Chartership Forum

Learning / technical review

Use the model
with its assumptions.

The teaching material includes simplified calculations. Numerical tests, standards checks and an independent engineering review answer different questions.

What has been checked

The lesson review covers the explanations, worked steps, exercises and feedback. Selected results have also been recalculated separately, including all 40 numeric practice answers in the first three Structural Analysis modules. The calculation suite includes regression checks for footing punching, composite construction stages, steel connections, foundation settlement, moving loads, modal stability and other defects found during review.

Editorial review and numerical checks do not establish design compliance. The lesson notes identify the assumptions, standards and calculations that still need independent engineering review.

Figures and interactive models

The latest pass checked all 40 authored lesson figures and exercised the controls for all 192 distinct laboratory models. Corrections include force directions, elastic curves, stress and strain scales, reinforcement geometry, moving-load peaks and unsupported input handling. Figures remain vector drawings; wider diagrams can be scrolled locally on a phone and enlarged where the browser supports it.

Control checks cover default settings and individual slider limits, plus visible choices. They do not exhaust every possible combination of inputs or establish suitability for a real structure. The separate bridge workspace and supplemental reference material have not received the same complete visual review.

Lesson-by-lesson review

401 of 401 course lessons and bridge component studies have received a full-context editorial review in the current pass. The register distinguishes that work from engineering sign-off, which remains open. Supplemental assessments, tutorials, reference tables and the bridge workspace also need further review.

Computational Engineering · 64/64 editorial reviews
Foundation Engineering · 36/36 editorial reviews
Reinforced Concrete Design · 41/41 editorial reviews
Soil Mechanics · 45/45 editorial reviews
Structural Steel Design · 40/40 editorial reviews
Structural Analysis Fundamentals · 72/72 editorial reviews
Structural Behaviour · 18/18 editorial reviews
Structural Dynamics · 38/38 editorial reviews
Bridge engineering · 47/47 editorial reviews
  • bridge — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • deck — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • girder — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • crossmember — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • bearing — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • bearing slide — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • bearing anchor — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • joint — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • joint seal — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • joint anchor — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • abutment — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • wingwall — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • pier — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • pilecap — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • pile — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • ground — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • approach — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • rail — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • fastening — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • sleeper — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • ballast — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • waterproof — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • drain — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • kerb — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • kerb rebar — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • parapet — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • arch — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • tie — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • truss — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • cable — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • hanger — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • tower — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • hopper — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • drain pipe — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • drain chamber — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • outfall — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • backwall drain — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • subsurface drain — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • carriageway — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • verge — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • access walkway — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • cable route — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • access opening — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • noise barrier — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • ocs — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • equipment — editorial review completed; expert verification open
  • rej — editorial review completed; expert verification open

Specific expert checks still open

Concrete and steel teaching editions

The calculation profiles retain their stated first-generation Eurocode basis. New UK National Annexes have been published for BS EN 1992-1-1:2023 (31 March 2026) and BS EN 1993-1-1:2022 (31 July 2026). The examples have not been converted into second-generation calculations.

Check the applicable authority and project specification during the coexistence period. Do not combine provisions from different generations without considering their reliability and compatibility.

References requiring particular care

Steel execution material was originally based on BS EN 1090-2:2008+A1:2011. BS EN 1090-2:2018+A1:2024 is the newer publication. The original plated-elements references also omitted A2:2019. Affected clauses and examples require review before project use.

Official publication records

For learning

Use exercises to understand a principle, check dimensions and test sensitivity to an assumption. For project decisions, use the appropriate current standards, competent engineering judgement and the required checking process.

Report a possible error with the lesson title, inputs and result to info@thechartershipforum.org.